I've been saying I would do it for years, but I finally did it... I did no adjusting to this. I didn't even pre-rank the teams. I ran it with the exact same variables as I do with six-man. I did try to run it a in a loop, but it really didn't make much of a difference, as it was pretty stable. It needs some adjusting...

RK	TEAM	REC	RATING
1	Texas Christian	8-0	1032.09
2	Oregon	7-0	1030.16
3	Missouri	7-0	1029.33
4	Auburn	8-0	1022.69
5	Michigan State	8-0	1020.72
6	Louisiana State	7-1	1018.1
7	Utah	7-0	1013.82
8	Wisconsin	7-1	1012
9	Boise State	6-0	1010.56
10	Oklahoma	6-1	1008.59
11	Ohio State	7-1	1002.66
12	Mississippi State	6-2	999.48
13	Stanford	6-1	999.23
14	Virginia Tech	6-2	995.85
15	Illinois	4-3	993.32
16	Florida State	6-1	991.08
17	Miami-Florida	5-2	964.02
18	Indiana	4-3	960.28
19	Iowa	5-2	956.22
20	Michigan	5-2	954.03
21	Northern Illinois	6-2	952.85
22	Arkansas	5-2	948.41
23	Texas A+M	4-3	946.04
24	Iowa State	4-4	944.66
25	Nebraska	6-1	943.73
26	Baylor	6-2	942.62
27	Oklahoma State	6-1	941.535
28	Arizona	6-1	939.35
29	Kansas State	5-2	939
30	U-C-F	5-2	938.53
31	Clemson	4-3	932.83
32	Florida	4-3	932.34
33	Penn State	4-3	932.02
34	Alabama	7-1	930.84
35	Navy	5-2	930.48
36	Texas Tech	4-3	930.21
37	No Carolina State	5-2	929.42
38	Southern Cal	5-2	929.4
39	Temple	6-2	929.17
40	Pittsburgh	4-3	928.27
41	West Virginia	5-2	925.62
42	Northwestern	5-2	923.42
43	North Carolina	4-3	923.26
44	East Carolina	5-2	921.76
45	Nevada-Reno	6-1	921.62
46	Notre Dame	4-4	921.574
47	Southern Miss	5-2	921.5
48	South Florida	4-3	920.13
49	South Carolina	5-2	919.66
50	Maryland	5-2	919.21
51	Air Force	5-3	918.09
52	Georgia	4-4	917.72
53	Georgia Tech	5-3	917.55
54	Wake Forest	2-5	917.4
55	Purdue	4-3	916.43
56	Oregon State	3-3	915.38
57	Texas	4-3	914.71
58	Hawaii	6-2	913.63
59	California	4-3	913.32
60	Syracuse	5-2	912.7
61	Minnesota	1-7	912.35
62	San Diego State	5-2	912.08
63	Virginia	3-4	911.15
64	Florida Intl	2-4	910.55
65	Boston College	2-5	909.75
66	Cincinnati	3-4	909.67
67	Colorado	3-4	909.46
68	Louisville	4-3	909.27
69	Tennessee	2-5	909.13
70	Toledo	5-3	907.91
71	Kansas	2-5	907.66
72	Louisiana Tech	3-4	907.6
73	U.C.L.A.	3-4	907.32
74	Duke	1-6	906.23
75	Kentucky	4-4	906.22
76	Army	4-3	906.06
77	Brigham Young	3-5	902.57
78	Vanderbilt	2-5	901.71
79	Tulsa	4-3	901.099
80	Rutgers	4-3	901.09
81	Connecticut	3-4	900.67
82	Buffalo	2-5	899.84
83	Mississippi	3-4	899.64
84	Fresno State	5-2	899.32
85	Wyoming	2-6	898.649
86	Washington	3-4	897.94
87	Arizona State	3-4	896.6788
88	Utah State	2-5	896.61
89	Idaho	4-3	896.03
90	Kent State	3-4	894.34
91	Troy	4-2	893.34
92	Ohio	5-3	892.21
93	Tulane	3-4	891.81
94	Western Michigan	3-4	890.49
95	Houston	4-3	889.97
96	Middle Tennessee	3-4	889.45
97	Miami-Ohio	4-4	889.44
98	San Jose State	1-7	888.92
99	Arkansas State	3-5	887.7
100	Western Kentucky	1-6	886.89
101	North Texas	1-6	886.23
102	Colorado State	2-6	885.58
103	Washington State	1-7	884.9
104	Memphis	1-6	884.01
105	S-M-U	4-4	883.2812
106	Florida Atlantic	1-5	881.18
107	Marshall	1-6	880.91
108	Bowling Green	1-7	880.55
109	UL-Lafayette	2-5	880.42
110	UL-Monroe	3-4	879.97
111	Akron	0-8	876.22
112	U-A-B	2-5	875.79
113	UTEP	5-3	874.32
114	Rice	2-6	874.05
115	New Mexico State	1-6	873.67
116	Nevada-Las Vegas	1-6	871.9
117	Central Michigan	2-6	869.42
118	Ball State	2-6	866.73
119	Eastern Michigan	1-7	864.79
120	New Mexico	0-7	861.68

I like yours better.

I like Notre Dame at # 46...

Are you going to do spreads for this weeks college games?

Not with this... I am working on a modified version that will

I like it. Would be hard to argue with it except for Alabama at #34.

agreed, but losing to South Carolina who lost to Kentucky is ugly and holding them down...

Granger, can you take Notre Dame even lower?

What's wrong, not enough wailing & gnashing of teeth about your six-man rankings? You have to start having people complain about college rankings now?

I have actually modified this to cap the score differential at 24 instead of 45 now and it looks a bit different... I have another version that is based on a system I developed 3 years ago for college tennis. It doesn't take score into effect at all, just winners and losers... I will probably average these for an overall. It looks pretty good.... the next step is the part that will predict lines...

oldfat&bald, I just dont like Notre Dame...

I like these rankings better, would like to see them become a regular part of this site.

I think that's a great idea. Is it a possibility granger?

I have actually created a composite ranking that seems to be real good... Will post again this week.

Granger doesn't need to push Notre Dame down in the rankings. All they need to do is step on the field and play. They will get there on their own!